Press Item ● Congress
For Immediate Release: 
October 8, 2004
Contact Info: 
David Stout

New York Times

WASHINGTON, Oct. 7 — Top House Democrats today condemned Representative Tom DeLay, the leader of the Republican majority, declaring that the latest ethics case against him proved that he had been corrupted by power and was unfit to lead.

"The ethical cloud that has been hanging over the Capitol has burst," Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, said at a news briefing. "Mr. DeLay has proven himself to be ethically unfit to lead the party.`

Other prominent Democrats joined Ms. Pelosi in condemning Mr. DeLay and calling for his replacement during a question-and-answer session that seemed to signal a new level of partisan bitterness in the House with elections less than four weeks away.

"Isolated incidents may be rationalized and minimized, but consistent patterns are powerful proof of corrupt practices," said Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the Democratic whip.

And Representative Henry Waxman of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee, said that "Tom DeLay has allowed power to corrupt him," and that the Republican leadership was trying to "whitewash" the charges against him.

Speaker J. Dennis Hastert came to Mr. DeLay's defense today, describing himself as "profoundly disappointed" in the ethics committee's finding against his fellow Republican. Mr. Hastert said in a statement that Mr. DeLay "fights hard for what he believes, but he has never put personal interests ahead of the best interests of the country."

The Democrats were reacting to a report issued Wednesday night by the House ethics committee, which unanimously admonished Mr. DeLay after concluding that he had apparently linked legislative action to political donations and had dispatched federal officials to search for Texas legislators who were in hiding to avoid having to vote on a redistricting issue.

Mr. DeLay defended himself as soon as the report came out. He accused Democrats of mounting "relentless personal attacks" on him in an attempt to "tie my hands and smear my good name." All the attacks, he said, "have fallen short, not because of insufficient venom but because of insufficient merit."

His Republican allies describe him as a good man and a good politician who is under attack for purely political reasons. Mr. DeLay, a Texan who has been on Capitol Hill for two decades, is acknowledged as a strong party leader. He is also an effective fund-raiser and wields great power in Congress.

The latest report by the House ethics panel (formally, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct) admonished Mr. DeLay for participating in a golf outing held by a Kansas energy company so that he could raise money for one of his political action committees. The outing coincided with deliberations on legislation from which the energy company stood to benefit.

The ethics panel, which has five Republicans and five Democrats, also admonished Mr. Delay for exhorting officials of the Federal Aviation Administration to track Texas state legislators who fled to Oklahoma last year to escape voting in Austin on a bill that reshaped the political landscape to benefit Republicans and give them perhaps four or more new Congressional seats next month. A challenge to the redistricting is before the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on it.

The Texas episode might have seemed to be more slapstick comedy than political drama, but the ethics panel said Mr. DeLay's actions had raised "serious concerns" about the use of government resources for a "political undertaking."

The panel deferred action on a third accusation against Mr. DeLay, that he improperly funneled contributions from a political action committee to the Republican National Committee, because that matter is under investigation by a grand jury in Texas. The jury has indicted some of Mr. DeLay's aides, along with several companies.

Democratic leaders said the ethics panel's action — the second in a week against Mr. Delay — illustrated the depths to which the legislative process had sunk under Mr. DeLay.

Last week, the panel admonished Mr. DeLay for trying to persuade a Michigan Republican, Representative Nick Smith, to change his vote on prescription drug legislation in exchange for political help for Mr. Smith's son in a Congressional primary. (Mr. Smith did not change his vote, and his son lost the primary.)

"Let me point out," Mr. Waxman said, "this is how legislation is done today — bribes, threats, allegations of payoffs, concealment."

Republicans control the House, with 227 seats, to 205 for the Democrats. There is one independent, Representative Bernard Sanders of Vermont, and there are two vacancies. Democrats dream of recapturing the House, which they lost in the 1994 elections, and they would love to block Mr. DeLay's ascension to speaker of the House after the incumbent, J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois, retires.

How the latest ethics case will affect Mr. DeLay's future may not be known for a while. But the case seems certain to intensify party feuds in the House, as illustrated in today's comments by Democrats.